Tristan Mccormick vs Luca Castagnola Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Who excels in second serve performance? Mccormick has a slight edge, winning 47.6% of second serve points compared to Castagnola's 46.49% in the last six months.
• Which player is stronger in return games? Castagnola dominates first serve returns with 34.42% over Mccormick’s 24.86%. Their second serve return stats are closely matched, with Castagnola winning 45.36% and Mccormick 45.01%.
• Under pressure, Mccormick shines, saving 60.26% of breakpoints, while Castagnola manages 51.17%—a crucial stat for in-game decisions.
• In terms of match wins over the last year, Mccormick leads with 54.55%, while Castagnola has secured 49.21%.
• How do their surface performances compare? Mccormick thrives on Grass with 67%, and Castagnola on Indoor Hard with 58%. Both have their weakest performance on different surfaces.
• Opposition quality highlights a slight advantage for Mccormick, who has faced opponents averaging a rank of 400.62 compared to Castagnola’s 440.89.
• In deciding sets, Mccormick prevails, winning 55% of such matches, whereas Castagnola wins 45%.
• Which player converts breakpoints better? Castagnola outdoes Mccormick by converting 38.76% of breakpoints versus Mccormick's 30.33%.

Editorial Prediction (September 14, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the performance statistics, Mccormick demonstrates a consistent edge in several key areas. Their second serve success and ability to perform under breakpoint pressure offer tactical advantages.

However, Castagnola's proficiency on returning first serves and converting breakpoints can't be overlooked. These strengths may level the playing field in crucial moments.

While both competitors have shown their strengths on different surfaces, Mccormick has faced slightly more challenging opponents and prevailed more often in deciding sets.

Based on these insights, Mccormick appears to be the more likely victor in this upcoming match.